Fallout: New Vegas

Released: 22/10/2010
Developer: Obsidian
Publisher: Bethesda Softworks
Format played: PC
Hours played: 137
Last played: 18/06/2012

Right, so, might as well start with my most-played Steam game. Now, I don’t want to bore you by doing a traditional review for a game that’s almost two years old that you either already own or don’t want to own (if you do want to own it, where the hell were you when The Great Steam Sale of Summer 2012 was on? Outdoors you say? OK, fine). At the same time, I’m not exactly trying to break any conventions here, I’m not known for being a boundary-pusher when it comes to writing but that may be because I’m not known for writing, full stop. Er, yeah.

I had been skeptical of Fallout: New Vegas, it was the big upcoming game when I first got into PC gaming and memories of the PS3 version of Fallout 3 were fresh in my mind; hours of exploration wasted because crashes, important NPCs dying even though I’m nowhere near them, other NPCs being stuck floating in mid-air… Plenty of game breaking glitches, basically. Then New Vegas came along, and I thought I was going to pass on it. I thought it would be a similar mess, but then I remembered that the PC version would allow you to fix such errors with the in-game console, and glitches aside, I did quite enjoy Fallout 3. So, bizarrely, I took the huge risk of buying it when it first came out. Yes, Fallout: New Vegas, a game I wasn’t sure about, was the first of very few games that I bought on Steam at full price.

The game, though, is fantastic and I promptly had to eat my words and hat. It takes what made Fallout 3 great, fixes the things that made me give up on it, simplifies the unnecessarily complicated parts (like the skills, now we have ‘Guns’ instead of ‘Big Guns’ and ‘Small Guns’ or whatever it is) and adds layers of complication of it’s own which initially do seem a little impenetrable, but they eventually click. That said I still don’t get what the different between damage reduction and damage threshold is. Anyway, new additions include:

  • Hardcore mode, which gives your character thirst, hunger and sleep gauges which need to be kept above a certain level or you’ll develop de-buffs and eventually die, kind of the same as the radiation or indeed life gauges.
  • Weapon attachments and modifications, which started life as a mod for Fallout 3 and was fleshed out in New Vegas. Things like silencers, scopes, larger magazines, lightweight frames, that sort of thing.
  • A faction system, which really should’ve replaced the karma system (which is, by and large, pointless in New Vegas). Basically if you help one faction they’ll like you and give you bonuses, other factions will hate you and want to kill you.
  • Traits, which are optional sort-of perks that give you a bonus but also balance it out by giving you an unbonus (seriously, what’s the opposite of a bonus?) at the same time, such as an increased rate of fire but with lower accuracy, or a +2 SPECIAL bonus in the day time but -2 at night, which by the way works quite well if you want to try hardcore mode.
  • An improved companion system, which uses a radial menu instead of the clunky interface in Fallout 3.
  • Challenges, such as ‘kill x amount of stuff with this weapon’

I think that’s all of the main ones. All in all, they massively improve on Fallout 3 and make the game that much better in my opinion. There are fewer glitches, to the point where I had one game-breaking glitch in New Vegas which was easily remedied with a little bit of reading and use of the in-game console, unlike Fallout 3 where I encountered many, oh so many glitches which would occasionally require me to re-play parts of the game from an old save.

One other thing, possibly the most important thing, I liked about New Vegas compared to Fallout 3 is that it let you play your character properly. In Fallout 3 you could decide to kill everyone you saw, yet the end of the game was always the same with one really minor difference which changed nothing, really. In New Vegas, although I must admit I’ve never done it, you can side with The Bad Guys and be A Bad Guy yourself, which is good because the kind of person who massacres an entire town for no reason wouldn’t exactly go and save a load of people just because he can, right?

However, the game isn’t perfect. I feel like the map isn’t quite as well-balanced as Fallout 3’s was, it seems like most of the settlements are in a sort of column down the centre of the map and there are maybe a handful outside of that group. I suspect this is to make the game appeal to more people who don’t have so much time to go walking around, it may also possibly be for pacing reasons, but whatever the reason I personally preferred Fallout 3’s world.

There are still glitches, no matter how fewer there are they do still exist. Many have been fixed but you do occasionally find one or two, which do completely shatter the immersion. One common one is to see insects, such as Radscorpions (not named for how cool they are) or Fire Ants, sort of walking vertically instead of on the ground. Not a huge deal, no, but still quite an odd thing to see in a 2010 game. I am kind of nitpicking here, in case you couldn’t tell.

Also it may be a little too easy to accumulate caps which can kind of break the game because then you stop surviving and start just, well, buying stuff you need. Towards the end, the game does get pretty easy; a high Guns skill player with an Anti-Materiel Rifle and the Hand Loader perk to make as many .50Cal Match rounds as they want can kill pretty much everything. Furthermore, certain companions are extremely overpowered to the point where you’ll tell them to stay at home so they stop stealing your kills but you still get the benefit of their perks. Minor balancing issues like that do happen but getting to the point where it becomes easy can be quite a struggle, and even when that does happen you can turn up the combat difficulty to compensate.

In closing, some say the game doesn’t do enough to improve on Fallout 3, but I can see why others say it’s a true Fallout game that builds on Fallout 3 just enough to oh-so-nearly perfect it. I was ‘new’ to the franchise with Fallout 3 (I had a shareware demo of Fallout 2 on an old beige Macintosh Performa, but I was so young that all I could think to do is shoot everyone, which is worrying) so I can’t comment on how good a Fallout game it is, not yet anyway, but it’s definitely something worth playing regardless of your history with the franchise.

TL, DR: New Vegas improves on Fallout 3 in many ways. You may not agree that the story is better and the map is probably not as good as before, but in almost every other way it’s an improvement.

Note: I have yet to play any of the DLC, expect a post detailing my thoughts on each at some point.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: